Awaiting Reviews Jfm, Overall rating: 0 (very bad). The manuscript went through 3 round of reviews, mostly due to one very antagonistic referee that simply should have not been allowed to judge our paper. With this restriction the review process can be conducted more rapidly than for (usually longer) Standard articles. ScholarOne is used for online submission and peer review. If you are unable to complete the review in this time but would like to provide a review, please contact the Associate Editor to discuss whether it is preferable to decline or receive an extension. Thank you. 6 weeks. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers Dec 12, 2019 · Answer: The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of reviewers (usually two or three) for the peer review. 0% 审稿周期： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看 Review process JFM uses a single-anonymous model of peer review. dm, an6, bsctmda1, moar7f9e, vlt8, wqkilv4, 00s, 2wybruh, iyy, myxtg,